Comic 55 - DODGING IMPLICATIONS

2nd Nov 2014, 4:09 PM
DODGING IMPLICATIONS
Average Rating: 5 (1 votes)
<<First Latest>>

Author Notes:

alschroeder 2nd Nov 2014, 4:09 PM edit delete
Continuing a look at the origin of reality...largely inspired and derived from George F.R. Ellis' brilliant brief book, BEFORE THE BEGINNING. He is NOT responsible, though, for the liberties I've taken with his logic or how I've chosen to illustrate it.


Looking at some non-theological interpretations of materialism that are not as bleak as the existential crisis brought on by pure materialism...


I didn't devote much time to Marxism and its implications, except to note that its value system seems to be decidedly NON-materialistic. Its claims to what is "best" seems self-evident and just built in to the universe. History, both in general and recent, seems to refute many of its claims anyway.


Sociobioloby and its successor, evolutionary psychology, is more recent in developement and much more in vogue among intellectual circles, and deserves a fuller treatment. I'm a strong believer in evolution, and certainly there are many truths in evolutionary psychology. Still, many laypeople are turning evolutionary psychology into something much broader than originally intended, and I'll be going into many misconceptions of same. (Most real evolutionary psychologists are aware of the limitations of their field of study, and several recent statements by such are careful to differentiate between biological altruism and true altruism.) Evolution is prone to many misapplications of its theory and used to justify things that would horrify Darwin himself--from Social Darwinism to SOME (not all, by any means) excesses of sociobiology.


More next time.









Next time: SOCIOBIOLOGY'S SHORTCOMINGS

Comments:

man in black 3rd Nov 2014, 12:48 AM edit delete reply
man in black
Great page
Frith Ra 3rd Nov 2014, 2:40 AM edit delete reply
Thank you for saying flat out that "social Darwinism" is nothing at all like what Old Chuck hypothesized. I've had that discussion too many times to want to rehash it again.